
Expand Energy (EXE)
America's biggest natural-gas producer, born from the merger of Chesapeake and Southwestern Energy.
Is Expand Energy a good stock for a UK beginner?
The honest version: America's biggest natural-gas producer, born from the merger of Chesapeake and Southwestern Energy.
Over about 2 years to 2026-07-31. This is the share price only - reinvesting the dividends would add to it. And it's the USD return - as a UK investor your actual £ return also moves with the exchange rate. Past performance is not a guide to the future, and it could just as easily have fallen.
Based on beta - how much the price swings versus the whole market. Bumpier isn't bad; it just means a rougher ride, which matters more the sooner you might need the money.
Prices move on results, news and the mood of the whole market - no single headline explains a day, and a quiet week is usually just noise, not a signal.
US natural-gas demand grows steadily via LNG exports and power/data-centre demand, and the combined company operates efficiently at scale.
Persistent oversupply of US natural gas or a slower-than-expected buildout of LNG export demand keeps prices structurally low.
What does Expand Energy do?
Expand Energy drills for natural gas across the big US shale basins, and it's the country's largest gas producer after Chesapeake Energy and Southwestern Energy joined forces. The business looks good on paper - a 24.9% net margin: How much of each £1 of sales becomes profit after all costs. Higher = more profitable per sale. and 41% revenue growth: How fast the company's sales grew versus a year ago. - yet the share price has slipped about 14% over the past year, the kind of gap you sometimes see when the mood hasn't caught up with improving numbers. Its trailing P/E: Price-to-earnings: the share price divided by yearly profit per share. Lower can mean cheaper; higher often means investors expect fast growth. is low at 6.5, but the forward P/E: Like P/E, but using analysts' forecast of NEXT year's profit instead of last year's. A much lower forward figure implies profits are expected to jump. of 10.3 is notably higher, hinting analysts expect earnings to ease from a recent high. The one thing worth watching -> a very weak momentum score (M12) alongside strong growth (G94) and income (I82) readings.
On our factor screen it looks strongest on value and income, and weakest on growth.
- ✓Pays a dividend - about 2.5% a year
- !Revenue slipped about 11% over the year
- ✓Very profitable - turns about 22% of sales into profit
- ·Low P/E of 8 vs last year's earnings
- ✓Low debt - a sturdier balance sheet
- Value screens high (76/100)
- Income screens high (71/100)
- Very low trailing P/E (6.5) versus the broader market
- Strong net margin (24.9%) and fast revenue growth (+41%)
- Relatively high dividend yield (3.6%)
- Growth screens low (4/100)
- Momentum screens low (31/100)
- Natural-gas price volatility, including seasonal and storage-driven swings
- Merger-integration execution risk following the Chesapeake/Southwestern combination
- Pace of LNG export-capacity buildout affecting demand for US gas
What do Expand Energy's numbers mean?
How much money does Expand Energy make?
Revenue and profit by quarter, and how much of each sale turns into profit.
Does Expand Energy pay a dividend?
Yes - Expand Energy currently pays a dividend of about 2.5% a year (the yearly payout as a share of the price). A dividend is a slice of profit handed to shareholders; the yield moves as the price moves, and a company can cut or stop it.
When does Expand Energy report earnings, and how did recent quarters go?
Expand Energy is next scheduled to report on about 2026-10-27 - dates can move, and we don't predict results; this just tells you when to look.
Each quarter a company reports its results against what analysts expected. ‘Beating’ or ‘missing’ is about that expectation, not whether the business is doing well in absolute terms.
| Reported | Expected EPS: The earnings per share analysts expected for the quarter - the average of their forecasts. 'Beating' or 'missing' is measured against this number. | Actual EPS | vs expected |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-28 | $1.12 | $1.33 | Beat +19% |
| 2026-04-28 | $3.63 | $3.83 | Beat +5% |
| 2026-02-17 | $1.89 | $2.00 | Beat +6% |
| 2025-10-28 | $0.85 | $0.97 | Beat +14% |
| 2025-07-29 | $1.15 | $1.10 | Missed -4% |
| 2025-04-29 | $1.87 | $2.02 | Beat +8% |
Across the last 6 quarters here, Expand Energy came in ahead of what analysts expected 5 times. One quarter is noise, not a trend.
See who else reports over the next two weeks →
Reported vs expected earnings per share (EPS) from published results; the expectation is the analyst consensus, not our view. Report dates are estimates that can move.
More in Energy
What are the scenarios for Expand Energy?
An illustrative range for the year ahead, with the assumption behind each case — not a prediction or a price target.
What are the pros and cons of Expand Energy?
How many points the write-up makes each way — a balance check, not a score or verdict.
- Very low trailing P/E (6.5) versus the broader market
- Strong net margin (24.9%) and fast revenue growth (+41%)
- Relatively high dividend yield (3.6%)
- Largest-scale US natural-gas producer following the merger, with strong growth and income factor scores (G94, I82)
- Very weak momentum score (M12) and a roughly -14% 12-month share-price decline despite strong reported fundamentals
- Forward P/E notably higher than trailing P/E, implying expected earnings moderation
- Natural-gas prices have historically been volatile and can swing profitability sharply
- Integration risk from the relatively recent large merger
- Natural-gas price volatility, including seasonal and storage-driven swings
- Merger-integration execution risk following the Chesapeake/Southwestern combination
- Pace of LNG export-capacity buildout affecting demand for US gas
- Broader energy-transition and regulatory risk affecting fossil-fuel producers
The write-up's own warning lights — if these start happening, the case above changes.
- A continued share-price decline alongside deteriorating (not just weak-momentum) fundamentals would undercut the fundamentals-versus-price divergence framing
- Evidence that merger integration costs are running well above plan
- A sustained further fall in natural-gas prices that compresses the currently strong net margin
Built from public filings & market prices, checked for an education-only tone, and never a price target. How we make these →